It’s very clean, simple, and easy to understand. Other things that are good about Clipchamp is the overall user interface. ![]() Clipchamp has this same thing from Filmora, though the “push” effect is a little bit quicker. ![]() As for the transitions, I use a “push” transition that pushes the main content to the right, when I want to insert B-roll over the main feed. I also could drag down and edit the size, and change the font on the title, or even the text style. It might not be added the same design, but this let me add section titles to podcast segments. In particular with features, there’s a green title bar that I use in Filmora which was here in Clipchamp, too. With Clipchamp, I barely lost 10% battery in editing. Usually, doing so with Filmora would drain my battery to empty in just one hour. I easily managed to edit a full podcast episode without draining down my Surface Laptop Studio battery. There’s also the fact that Clipchamp is web-based, so it doesn’t tax my PC as much when doing my video editing. ![]() Additionally, when put up against some of the stuff I usually use in Fillmora Wondershare, I was surprised to find out that there’s a lot of great titles (lower thirds,) and transitions in Clipchamp, too. For a free video editor, there’s a lot that I like about Clipchamp as it helped me edit the podcast like I usually would through Filmora Wondershare (see above for the final result.) The service has plenty of good things that work out well for editing videos when you don’t have a system with a powerful GPU or CPU for video editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |